Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id KAA14491 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:54:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzztv08762; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:51:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA17324; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:48:42 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:48:42 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <3104FEFB.55B0@ix.netcom.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: John Mark Roquemore <johnmark@ix.netcom.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Of Banding & Penguins
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
I think Ernie has a point, just look at the perfect movements. I think
the people how did the Diet Coke Bears did the penguins too. Rythem and
Hues(sp) is the group I think.
John Roquemore
Ernie Wright wrote:
>
> Chris Hanson wrote:
>
> > Hmm. What did your nanometer-wavelength calibrated eye spot that
> > led you to believe it was a CG penguin? Everything I saw suggested
> > it was real.
>
> Even when he's tuning the car radio?
>
> Here's what led *me* to think it was all CG.
>
> 1. He slips while walking uphill and falls *backwards*.
> 2. Head movements look suspiciously smooth in the "snow angel" shot.
> 3. The choreography is perfect.
> 4. The closer you get to the penguin, the less he moves.
>
> There's no way to know about every shot just from watching, but I